I am not trying to cause an uproar
of comments or a bunch of, “you’re wrong and I’m right” debates, but I am just
saying that you do not need a mass-murder weapon like the ones used in the
Sandy Hook Elementary or Aurora, Colorado theatre shootings. My manager at work
(who trains children gun and knife safety at Boy Scout camp) would argue that
you do need guns. I honestly never really listen to him when he explains his
reasoning to me, partly because I don’t like debates about current events, and
also because I don’t like listening to topics that are currently sensitive in
modern day culture.
The argument on the news was that
President Obama should do something about the video game industry and the
ratings on violent video games. My questions are: What else can he do? What
else is there for video game companies to do? The problem isn’t the ratings on
the games, the problem is the parents who buy their children the video games
and then wonder why they are always consumed in them. Call of Duty is rated M
for MATURE. This means anyone ages seventeen and up. Yet, parents still buy
their 8 year olds these games. Do they not realize what they are letting their child
do? Basically, they are telling the child that they can have anything they want
and do whatever they want when they are given the freedom to play a violent
video game. I know that it’s not a real life scenario, but what happened to the
innocence in children? Why can’t they play Super Mario Bros and be happy?
Parents who buy their young children video games are basically conforming to
the social norm of the ‘cool, new thing,’ without thinking twice about what the
game actually is. There is nothing wrong with the video game industry, nor
President Obama’s action on this topic, it’s something that is happening in
American families that needs to be taken care of. (438)
No comments:
Post a Comment